
Bad Art
he's a terrible artist but a virtuoso of spreading dysfunction imagining arguing anything on a canvas whatever combination of color line and form constitutes art by definition as such by definition his colored forms brushed on canvas are art just like what rembrandt and van gogh created: art you may say rembrandt's is pleasant while his is not so he will say art is created by the artist and by definition artist and artist are the same thing so you may say there's a difference between good and bad art making a difference between artist and artist so he will say his is anti-art and he is the anti-artist and that art is as much about concept as it is about aesthetics making him more like rembrandt than any of the public or the critics or you care to know much of art is subjective and can still be objectively bad and deceptive just like people objectively or subjectively bad even though all of us possess most of the same things within our frames
