Bad Art
he's a terrible artist
but a virtuoso
of spreading dysfunction
imagining
arguing
anything on a canvas
whatever combination
of color
line and form
constitutes art
by definition
as such
by definition
his colored forms
brushed on canvas
are art
just like
what rembrandt
and van gogh created:
art
you may say
rembrandt's is pleasant
while his is not
so he will say
art
is created
by the artist
and
by definition
artist and artist
are the same thing
so you may say
there's a difference
between good and bad art
making a difference
between artist and artist
so he will say
his is anti-art
and he
is the anti-artist
and that art
is as much about concept
as it is about aesthetics
making him
more like rembrandt
than any of the public
or the critics
or you
care to know
much of art is subjective
and can still be
objectively bad
and deceptive
just like people
objectively or subjectively
bad
even though
all of us
possess
most of the
same things
within our frames
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related