Monsters, Molyneux and Chomsky
i awaited the next crisis just to see what those who give us answers to the reasons for our crises would have to say the crisis came as it always does this one the monsters coming from space from the depths of our oceans the deepest crevices of our soil coming to the surface creating chaos and destruction everywhere so i went to the ones that we turn to for answers the first one chomsky who said the reason for godzilla mothra and king hidorah's anger the ultimate cause of all the destruction lay at the feet of western imperialism free markets and our environmental abuse it was strange these reasons the same reasons for all the other catastrophes and crises according to the old philosopher so i turned to a new philosopher a younger one molyneux who too seemed to have the answers to everything to every crisis who explained the reason for the monsters' attacks the reason for all of the devastation ultimately fell on women their fragility their abuses their frivolities them distracting the rest from full preparedness for the attack of the monsters when it came and if that wasn't enough from the great philosopher we can reduce this crisis like all the others down to communists or race the races of both men and monsters the strife between them the same as between us the necessary strife and destruction when things mix that ought not mix they give us three course meals of reasons and excuses cause all that sounds better or makes the philosopher's explanation more palatable by being more robust than just blaming either women communists or race alone and the other philosopher the old one when he can't blame it on howard roark he has a couple of other cards to play since more villains than one always makes for a more robust more exciting more complex story than having just one
mrobins71 